In this chapter Routman discusses how we need to make sure our students have the background knowledge and textual knowledge to comprehend a text, otherwise they will be lost. As I read about this, my thoughts immediately went to the Science and Social Studies textbooks we use. Most of the textbooks are written above grade level and students have a hard time comprehending these texts. I usually read these texts as shared reading, but if I have them read independently or with partners, I have to ask myself-do they get it? Chances are they don't.
When it comes to reading these texts, I need to do a better job with vocabulary and re-reading. I either assume they know the meaning of words or am too worried about time and want to make sure I teach the material. For example, as we were reading the text from the Science book, a student interrupted and asked me what a word meant. I told them, but it made me think. I honestly just assumed they knew what the word meant, so I did not stop to discuss. This made me realize that I need to slow down and stop more frequently to check in with them to see if the text makes sense. It is not benefiting me or them if I rush and do not model comprehension in all subjects.
Here are my take aways from this chapter:
- I really liked how she modeled for teachers in a workshop the comprehension process. I do want to have my students read an article, write down a take away, notice the strategies used, and talk about what strategies they used.
- I need to emphasize rereading.
- When I model annotating, I need to talk about what strategies I used. Most of the time my students just use questioning, so this would help them see they do more that just question.
- Before reading a texts, I need to preview or surveying the book with my class.
I am excited about challenging my students to make comprehension automatic.
Sara Margaret, you've focused on excellent points from Routman's text. Teaching comprehension is very overwhelming. We focus on teaching skills in isolation and then students are not able to apply them when they work independently. Your plan to model more as you read content area texts is excellent. Those textbooks are overwhelming even to some of our advance readers. However, treating them like a resource to get information and showing your students how to transfer those reading skills across content areas will help them practice automatic comprehension. Your take aways were especially well thought out. Most of our students don't see the value in rereading. Modeling for them how you reread for meaning even as a well read adult will help them see that rereading is often necessary for complete comprehension.
ReplyDeleteHi Sara Margaret,
ReplyDeleteI always appreciate your sincere reflective practice and how you approach each chapter looking for how the author can help benefit your students as readers and improve your reading instruction. Like you, I found Routman's chapter on comprehension very beneficial. In addition to her focus on modeling and utilizing metacognition through think alouds I also appreciated how she made the point of making sure our students have opportunities to apply what they are learning in independent reading application. Thank you! Dawn