Tina Nottingham - Blog post 3:
October: Ch. 8: Teaching Comprehension
The first paragraph of this article describes
my special education students exactly.
My students spend most of their energy trying to decode unfamiliar words
which causes most of their efforts to be spent on trying to read rather than
reading. We see this a lot in Resource
due to the fact that most of our students are 1-2 plus years behind in reading
by the time that they are placed in special education. They have limited sight word vocabularies and
often times do not understand the meanings of words due to esol or limited
exposure to reading early on. They are literal thinkers who struggle to
obtain deeper meaning from the stories that they read. The article discusses the need for less
direct instruction teaching and more independent reading time. This is a roadblock for my students due to
the fact that they require direct instruction and often time one on one
instruction for most tasks. Another
point that was made is that reading comprehension has to start in preschool or
Kindergarten. Unfortunately, these same
students who have learning disabilities never master this skill early on
therefore they struggle with comprehension their entire academic careers. I agree with the suggestion that texts need
to be challenging and interesting. The
curriculum that I use is based on non-fiction texts which the students enjoy
and can relate to things that they are learning in their classrooms. The challenge is finding texts that match
their instructional level that also appeal to their experiences. I feel it is important for me to go back and
demonstrate some of the strategies that are listed in the article. I will have to focus on one or two strategies
at a time to make sure that my students aren’t overwhelmed and actually develop
an understanding of these strategies. I
would like to start with making connections and asking questions. These are skills that I believe my students
can be successful at. Other strategies
can be introduced as they get better at these.
I will have to monitor their progress to make sure that they are
actually uses these strategies. One
strategy that I use consistently is re-reading.
We spend a lot of time re-reading stories. This helps with fluency and
comprehension. We also talk about making
connections to other stories that we have read to check for memory and
understanding. A strategy that most of
my students struggle with is self-monitoring.
They are unaware of the idea that they need to be questioning their
reading and their understanding. They
are so focused on getting through a passage and decoding words that they don’t
think to stop and ask themselves questions or to question what the author’s
purpose is. I am excited to try these
strategies with my students and see how their comprehension improves. Hopefully, I will see some positive changes
in the way that they respond to our texts and see some growth in closing the
gap in reading.
I'm glad you were able to apply what you read to the curriculum you teach in the resource classroom. Teaching those strategies of connecting to text and asking questions is a great first step. Students can use those same strategies regardless of the text they are reading and in their general education settings. Incorporating these into your curriculum is a wonderful idea.
ReplyDeleteI agree giving students something they are interested in reading will help increase their love for reading. I think you will definitely see some changes in your student's comprehension abilities.
ReplyDeleteHi Tina,
ReplyDeleteThe time and thought you put into the instruction you provide for your students is evident in this post. You are right that many times our students who struggle with learning disabilities do benefit from direct instruction with explicit modeling of the proficient reading strategy followed by application. You mentioned how you knew your students could benefit from teaching them self monitoring strategies. This is one that I have found to be extremely useful with students as well. Sincerely, Dawn